205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.14%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AMD's 0.99%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
12.87%
Cost growth above 1.5x AMD's 3.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
13.66%
Positive growth while AMD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.46%
Margin expansion while AMD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.94%
R&D growth less than half of AMD's 9.22%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.71%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x AMD's 4.72%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
12.59%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AMD's 3.99%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.34%
EBITDA growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.59%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
17.15%
Operating income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.55%
Operating margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
75.00%
Other expenses growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
17.82%
Pre-tax income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.14%
Pre-tax margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.86%
Tax expense growth while AMD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.87%
Net income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.83%
Net margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.00%
EPS growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.00%
Diluted EPS growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.82%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AMD's 6.10%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
1.33%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of AMD's 0.55%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.