205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.42%
Revenue decline while AMD shows 11.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
6.96%
Cost growth above 1.5x AMD's 3.44%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-0.96%
Gross profit decline while AMD shows 37.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.54%
Margin decline while AMD shows 23.58% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.11%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
188.89%
Other expenses change of 188.89% while AMD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
5.35%
Operating expenses growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.37%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AMD's 1.47%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-135.38%
D&A reduction while AMD shows 1.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-27.25%
EBITDA decline while AMD shows 215.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.94%
EBITDA margin decline while AMD shows 203.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.38%
Operating income decline while AMD shows 42.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.97%
Operating margin decline while AMD shows 48.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
187.50%
Other expenses growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.68%
Pre-tax income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.16%
Pre-tax margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.21%
Tax expense growth while AMD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
21.82%
Net income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.33%
Net margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.29%
EPS growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.00%
Diluted EPS growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.86%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AMD's 100.90%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
5.55%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x AMD's 97.42%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.