205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-51.02%
Revenue decline while AVGO shows 0.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-52.73%
Cost reduction while AVGO shows 0.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-46.54%
Gross profit decline while AVGO shows 0.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
9.15%
Margin expansion while AVGO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-55.80%
R&D reduction while AVGO shows 19.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.72%
Operating expenses reduction while AVGO shows 12.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-46.87%
Total costs reduction while AVGO shows 6.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
120.00%
D&A growth less than half of AVGO's 4313.59%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-7.91%
EBITDA decline while AVGO shows 62.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-120.30%
EBITDA margin decline while AVGO shows 61.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-55.20%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-216.85%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-250.00%
Other expenses reduction while AVGO shows 3.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-66.92%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-240.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-666.67%
Tax expense reduction while AVGO shows 1023.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
80.95%
Net income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
61.11%
Net margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
81.13%
EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
81.13%
Diluted EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.19%
Share count reduction below 50% of AVGO's 0.26%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.19%
Diluted share increase while AVGO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.