205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.10%
Revenue decline while AVGO shows 9.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.17%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-6.45%
Gross profit decline while AVGO shows 21.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.70%
Margin expansion below 50% of AVGO's 11.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.83%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.93%
Other expenses reduction while AVGO shows 125.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-7.08%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-7.59%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
5.56%
Interest expense growth while AVGO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.22%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
6.54%
EBITDA growth below 50% of AVGO's 39.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.69%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of AVGO's 27.77%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-5.45%
Operating income decline while AVGO shows 244.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.78%
Operating margin growth below 50% of AVGO's 232.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1371.43%
Other expenses growth while AVGO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.40%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of AVGO's 155.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
16.69%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of AVGO's 151.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
23.97%
Tax expense growth less than half of AVGO's 818.80%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
8.16%
Net income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.43%
Net margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.00%
EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.08%
Diluted EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.51%
Share count reduction while AVGO shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.10%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 0.48%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.