205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.61%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 4.68%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
4.10%
Cost increase while AVGO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
11.90%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of AVGO's 19.34%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
3.03%
Margin expansion below 50% of AVGO's 14.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.20%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.47%
Operating expenses reduction while AVGO shows 23.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.89%
Similar total costs growth to AVGO's 1.17%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.51%
D&A growth while AVGO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
18.65%
EBITDA growth 1.25-1.5x AVGO's 14.55%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
9.24%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 4.59%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
24.52%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 14.44%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
14.65%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 9.32%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while AVGO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
24.62%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of AVGO's 39.95%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
14.74%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of AVGO's 33.69%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
60.00%
Tax expense growth less than half of AVGO's 3753.45%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
20.85%
Net income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.27%
Net margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.33%
EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.49%
Diluted EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.11%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 0.28%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.11%
Diluted share increase while AVGO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.