205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.31%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x LSCC's 3.18%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
6.66%
Cost growth above 1.5x LSCC's 2.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
11.33%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x LSCC's 3.70%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.84%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x LSCC's 0.50%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.93%
R&D growth less than half of LSCC's 5.18%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.33%
Operating expenses growth less than half of LSCC's 5.14%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
5.10%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x LSCC's 4.10%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
3.91%
Interest expense change of 3.91% while LSCC maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
8.33%
D&A growth less than half of LSCC's 614.33%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
13.20%
EBITDA growth below 50% of LSCC's 124.72%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.56%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of LSCC's 117.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.05%
Operating income growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.99%
Operating margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-77.08%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
15.83%
Pre-tax income growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.96%
Pre-tax margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
88.66%
Tax expense growth while LSCC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.84%
Net income growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.48%
Net margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.85%
EPS growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.16%
Diluted EPS growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.22%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.44%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.