PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.15%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 7.98%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
10.63%
Cost growth above 1.5x LSCC's 7.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
8.67%
Similar gross profit growth to LSCC's 8.54%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-2.23%
Margin decline while LSCC shows 0.52% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
33.25%
R&D growth above 1.5x LSCC's 2.66%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
23.10%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x LSCC's 1.20%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.69%
Total costs growth above 1.5x LSCC's 3.97%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.87%
D&A growth while LSCC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
95.13%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x LSCC's 11.29%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
95.61%
EBITDA margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-14.93%
Operating income decline while LSCC shows 25.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.46%
Operating margin decline while LSCC shows 16.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-58.67%
Other expenses reduction while LSCC shows 234.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-45.31%
Pre-tax income decline while LSCC shows 35.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-50.79%
Pre-tax margin decline while LSCC shows 25.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.36%
Tax expense reduction while LSCC shows 35.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-47.61%
Net income decline while LSCC shows 35.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-52.86%
Net margin decline while LSCC shows 25.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.68%
EPS decline while LSCC shows 29.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-47.22%
Diluted EPS decline while LSCC shows 37.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.47%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x LSCC's 4.67%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-4.07%
Diluted share reduction while LSCC shows 3.77% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.