205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.74%
Revenue decline while LSCC shows 5.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-10.06%
Cost reduction while LSCC shows 5.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
0.15%
Gross profit growth below 50% of LSCC's 5.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.25%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x LSCC's 0.26%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.43%
R&D growth less than half of LSCC's 7.30%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.29%
Operating expenses reduction while LSCC shows 3.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.27%
Total costs reduction while LSCC shows 4.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.84%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-0.90%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.14%
EBITDA margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.69%
Operating income growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.94%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x LSCC's 5.25%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-45.24%
Other expenses reduction while LSCC shows 166.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.40%
Pre-tax income decline while LSCC shows 17.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.42%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of LSCC's 21.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
69.23%
Tax expense change of 69.23% while LSCC maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
-16.12%
Net income decline while LSCC shows 17.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.01%
Net margin decline while LSCC shows 21.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.24%
EPS decline while LSCC shows 20.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.29%
Diluted EPS decline while LSCC shows 20.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.33%
Share count reduction while LSCC shows 0.25% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.36%
Diluted share reduction while LSCC shows 0.25% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.