205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.22%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x LSCC's 4.68%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
4.95%
Cost growth above 1.5x LSCC's 0.73%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
31.76%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x LSCC's 8.27%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
12.41%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x LSCC's 3.42%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.27%
R&D reduction while LSCC shows 7.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.24%
Other expenses reduction while LSCC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-8.07%
Operating expenses reduction while LSCC shows 0.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.14%
Total costs growth less than half of LSCC's 0.62%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.72%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
51.59%
EBITDA growth below 50% of LSCC's 252.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
29.32%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of LSCC's 169.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
122.45%
Operating income growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
89.78%
Operating margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-84.62%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
114.89%
Pre-tax income growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
83.33%
Pre-tax margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
136.46%
Tax expense change of 136.46% while LSCC maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
106.92%
Net income growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
76.53%
Net margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
104.76%
EPS growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
110.00%
Diluted EPS growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.95%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.31%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.