205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.49%
Revenue decline while LSCC shows 7.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.86%
Cost reduction while LSCC shows 3.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.01%
Gross profit decline while LSCC shows 11.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.53%
Margin decline while LSCC shows 3.18% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.78%
R&D growth while LSCC reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.68%
Other expenses reduction while LSCC shows 157.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-3.78%
Operating expenses reduction while LSCC shows 1.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.05%
Total costs reduction while LSCC shows 2.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.17%
Interest expense growth while LSCC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-17.99%
D&A reduction while LSCC shows 4.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-7.20%
EBITDA decline while LSCC shows 33.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.80%
EBITDA margin decline while LSCC shows 38.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.44%
Operating income growth below 50% of LSCC's 63.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.95%
Operating margin growth below 50% of LSCC's 51.12%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-280.00%
Other expenses reduction while LSCC shows 157.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.61%
Pre-tax income decline while LSCC shows 78.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.13%
Pre-tax margin decline while LSCC shows 65.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.60%
Tax expense growth less than half of LSCC's 53.10%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-4.70%
Net income decline while LSCC shows 83.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.26%
Net margin decline while LSCC shows 69.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.35%
EPS decline while LSCC shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.35%
Diluted EPS decline while LSCC shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.46%
Share count reduction while LSCC shows 0.62% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.54%
Diluted share reduction while LSCC shows 1.50% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.