205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.55%
Positive growth while LSCC shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.85%
Cost increase while LSCC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
10.73%
Positive growth while LSCC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.00%
Margin expansion while LSCC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.44%
R&D growth while LSCC reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.38%
Other expenses reduction while LSCC shows 481.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
0.22%
Operating expenses growth while LSCC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.93%
Total costs growth while LSCC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.11%
Interest expense growth while LSCC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.17%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
15.17%
EBITDA growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.09%
EBITDA margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.21%
Operating income growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.90%
Operating margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x LSCC's 28.41%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
18.41%
Pre-tax income growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.08%
Pre-tax margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
66.67%
Tax expense growth while LSCC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.92%
Net income growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.43%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.06%
EPS growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.19%
Diluted EPS growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.40%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.39%
Diluted share reduction while LSCC shows 0.48% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.