205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.89%
Revenue decline while LSCC shows 3.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-10.27%
Cost reduction while LSCC shows 13.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-8.13%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.83%
Margin expansion while LSCC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.93%
R&D growth while LSCC reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.23%
Other expenses growth less than half of LSCC's 35.34%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
1.04%
Operating expenses growth while LSCC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.06%
Total costs reduction while LSCC shows 2.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
10.53%
Interest expense growth 50-75% of LSCC's 20.76%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-0.44%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-11.71%
EBITDA decline while LSCC shows 142.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.58%
Operating income decline while LSCC shows 98.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.05%
Operating margin decline while LSCC shows 98.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1400.00%
Other expenses reduction while LSCC shows 9.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-13.36%
Pre-tax income decline while LSCC shows 84.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.90%
Pre-tax margin decline while LSCC shows 85.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
139.29%
Tax expense growth less than half of LSCC's 285.80%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-73.23%
Net income decline while LSCC shows 83.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-70.62%
Net margin decline while LSCC shows 83.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-72.87%
EPS decline while LSCC shows 82.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-73.02%
Diluted EPS decline while LSCC shows 83.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.30%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.10%
Diluted share reduction while LSCC shows 0.45% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.