205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.89%
Revenue decline while LSCC shows 2.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.52%
Cost reduction while LSCC shows 0.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-14.65%
Gross profit decline while LSCC shows 2.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.22%
Margin decline while LSCC shows 0.79% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.70%
R&D growth while LSCC reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.66%
Other expenses reduction while LSCC shows 0.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-2.98%
Operating expenses reduction while LSCC shows 0.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.69%
Total costs reduction while LSCC shows 0.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
13.21%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x LSCC's 1.03%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
0.38%
D&A growth less than half of LSCC's 5.40%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-16.25%
EBITDA decline while LSCC shows 11.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.01%
EBITDA margin decline while LSCC shows 5.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.75%
Operating income decline while LSCC shows 10.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.81%
Operating margin decline while LSCC shows 8.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
55.00%
Other expenses growth 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 37.52%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize cost items.
-18.47%
Pre-tax income decline while LSCC shows 12.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.50%
Pre-tax margin decline while LSCC shows 10.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-43.53%
Tax expense reduction while LSCC shows 124.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.51%
Net income decline while LSCC shows 11.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.06%
Net margin decline while LSCC shows 9.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.94%
EPS decline while LSCC shows 11.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.77%
Diluted EPS decline while LSCC shows 12.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.77%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.76%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.