205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.55%
Revenue growth 50-75% of LSCC's 2.33%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
3.72%
Cost increase while LSCC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-0.04%
Gross profit decline while LSCC shows 13.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.57%
Margin decline while LSCC shows 11.31% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.30%
R&D growth 50-75% of LSCC's 8.42%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.55%
Operating expenses growth while LSCC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.37%
Total costs growth above 1.5x LSCC's 0.85%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-1.54%
Interest expense reduction while LSCC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.07%
D&A growth while LSCC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.95%
EBITDA decline while LSCC shows 622.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.41%
EBITDA margin decline while LSCC shows 610.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.85%
Operating income decline while LSCC shows 157.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.31%
Operating margin decline while LSCC shows 155.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-166.67%
Other expenses reduction while LSCC shows 173.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.11%
Pre-tax income decline while LSCC shows 158.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.54%
Pre-tax margin decline while LSCC shows 157.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-37.01%
Tax expense reduction while LSCC shows 109.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.16%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.27%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.54%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.22%
Share count reduction while LSCC shows 0.05% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.33%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.