205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.53%
Revenue growth 50-75% of MCHP's 10.82%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
8.23%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x MCHP's 6.26%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
-4.88%
Gross profit decline while MCHP shows 15.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-9.86%
Margin decline while MCHP shows 3.85% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.94%
Operating expenses growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.99%
Total costs growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.00%
D&A growth while MCHP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-133.33%
EBITDA decline while MCHP shows 144.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-131.59%
EBITDA margin decline while MCHP shows 120.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-115.79%
Operating income decline while MCHP shows 132.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-114.96%
Operating margin decline while MCHP shows 128.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-200.00%
Other expenses reduction while MCHP shows 29.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-133.33%
Pre-tax income decline while MCHP shows 90.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-131.59%
Pre-tax margin decline while MCHP shows 91.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-85.71%
Tax expense reduction while MCHP shows 120.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-163.64%
Net income decline while MCHP shows 87.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-160.30%
Net margin decline while MCHP shows 89.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-220.00%
EPS decline while MCHP shows 70.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-220.00%
Diluted EPS decline while MCHP shows 70.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.25%
Share count reduction below 50% of MCHP's 0.33%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.25%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MCHP's 0.33%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.