205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-25.76%
Revenue decline while MCHP shows 10.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-26.53%
Cost reduction while MCHP shows 9.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-23.84%
Gross profit decline while MCHP shows 10.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.58%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 0.22%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.73%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MCHP's 8.84%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-20.82%
Total costs reduction while MCHP shows 9.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-77.42%
D&A reduction while MCHP shows 12.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-61.38%
EBITDA decline while MCHP shows 12.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-47.98%
EBITDA margin decline while MCHP shows 2.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.83%
Operating income decline while MCHP shows 12.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-35.12%
Operating margin decline while MCHP shows 2.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
109.52%
Other expenses growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-44.19%
Pre-tax income decline while MCHP shows 11.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.82%
Pre-tax margin decline while MCHP shows 0.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.60%
Tax expense reduction while MCHP shows 24.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-43.99%
Net income decline while MCHP shows 6.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.55%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.89%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.89%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.06%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 8.75%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.20%
Diluted share reduction while MCHP shows 8.75% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.