205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.12%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 2.85%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
5.28%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x MCHP's 4.01%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
16.17%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 1.72%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.69%
Margin expansion while MCHP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.71%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while MCHP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
8.96%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MCHP's 90.54%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
6.62%
Total costs growth less than half of MCHP's 33.44%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.68%
D&A growth while MCHP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
42.76%
EBITDA growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
26.19%
EBITDA margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.17%
Operating income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-39.86%
Other expenses reduction while MCHP shows 59.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.68%
Pre-tax income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-11.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.72%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
13.43%
Net income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.27%
Net margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.33%
EPS growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.70%
Diluted EPS growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.53%
Share count increase while MCHP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.38%
Diluted share increase while MCHP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.