205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.22%
Positive growth while MCHP shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.95%
Cost increase while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
31.76%
Positive growth while MCHP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
12.41%
Margin expansion while MCHP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.27%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.24%
Other expenses reduction while MCHP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-8.07%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.14%
Total costs growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.72%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
51.59%
EBITDA growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
29.32%
EBITDA margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
122.45%
Operating income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
89.78%
Operating margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-84.62%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
114.89%
Pre-tax income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
83.33%
Pre-tax margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
136.46%
Tax expense growth while MCHP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
106.92%
Net income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
76.53%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 34.22%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
104.76%
EPS growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
110.00%
Diluted EPS change of 110.00% while MCHP is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-0.95%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.31%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.