205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.34%
Positive growth while MCHP shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.22%
Cost growth 50-75% of MCHP's 2.18%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
7.29%
Positive growth while MCHP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.83%
Margin expansion while MCHP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.80%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.00%
Other expenses change of 20.00% while MCHP maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-0.56%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.61%
Total costs growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.62%
D&A reduction while MCHP shows 0.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
10.78%
EBITDA growth below 50% of MCHP's 36.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.17%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MCHP's 51.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.68%
Operating income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.91%
Operating margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
200.00%
Other expenses growth 1.25-1.5x MCHP's 149.25%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize cost items.
15.16%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MCHP's 33.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.37%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MCHP's 47.62%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.44%
Tax expense reduction while MCHP shows 111.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
21.75%
Net income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.68%
Net margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.26%
EPS growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.81%
Diluted EPS growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.04%
Share count reduction while MCHP shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.63%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.