205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.86%
Positive growth while MCHP shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.91%
Cost increase while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
7.84%
Positive growth while MCHP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.92%
Margin expansion while MCHP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-5.70%
R&D reduction while MCHP shows 0.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.22%
Other expenses reduction while MCHP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-7.14%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.48%
Total costs growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.76%
Interest expense reduction while MCHP shows 11.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.61%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
29.49%
EBITDA growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.18%
EBITDA margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.63%
Operating income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
40.96%
Operating margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.14%
Other expenses growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
59.12%
Pre-tax income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
48.91%
Pre-tax margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
34.02%
Tax expense growth while MCHP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
68.30%
Net income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
57.50%
Net margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
65.22%
EPS growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
72.73%
Diluted EPS growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.26%
Share count reduction while MCHP shows 0.37% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.94%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.