205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.49%
Revenue decline while MCHP shows 7.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.86%
Cost reduction while MCHP shows 2.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.01%
Gross profit decline while MCHP shows 11.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.53%
Margin decline while MCHP shows 3.65% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.78%
R&D growth above 1.5x MCHP's 3.76%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.68%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-3.78%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.05%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
4.17%
Interest expense growth less than half of MCHP's 19.37%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-17.99%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-7.20%
EBITDA decline while MCHP shows 5.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.44%
Operating income growth below 50% of MCHP's 73.51%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.95%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MCHP's 61.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-280.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1.61%
Pre-tax income decline while MCHP shows 82.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.13%
Pre-tax margin decline while MCHP shows 69.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.60%
Tax expense growth less than half of MCHP's 215.40%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-4.70%
Net income decline while MCHP shows 31.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.26%
Net margin decline while MCHP shows 22.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.35%
EPS decline while MCHP shows 33.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.35%
Diluted EPS decline while MCHP shows 35.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.46%
Share count reduction while MCHP shows 0.53% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.54%
Diluted share reduction while MCHP shows 1.35% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.