205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.85%
Positive growth while MCHP shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
17.89%
Cost increase while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
17.82%
Positive growth while MCHP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.85%
R&D growth while MCHP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.08%
Other expenses reduction while MCHP shows 98.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-1.17%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
9.80%
Total costs growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.08%
Interest expense growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.40%
D&A growth less than half of MCHP's 20.87%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
19.67%
EBITDA growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.55%
EBITDA margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.03%
Operating income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.19%
Operating margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-143.14%
Other expenses reduction while MCHP shows 7.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
24.08%
Pre-tax income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.29%
Pre-tax margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
331.68%
Tax expense growth while MCHP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.96%
Net income decline while MCHP shows 185.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.80%
Net margin decline while MCHP shows 196.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.65%
EPS decline while MCHP shows 182.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.03%
Diluted EPS decline while MCHP shows 172.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.11%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 0.34%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.22%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 1.18%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.