205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.89%
Revenue decline while MCHP shows 4.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.52%
Cost reduction while MCHP shows 3.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-14.65%
Gross profit decline while MCHP shows 5.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.22%
Margin decline while MCHP shows 0.84% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.70%
R&D growth less than half of MCHP's 5.58%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.66%
Other expenses reduction while MCHP shows 393.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-2.98%
Operating expenses reduction while MCHP shows 3.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.69%
Total costs reduction while MCHP shows 3.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
13.21%
Interest expense growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.38%
D&A growth while MCHP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-16.25%
EBITDA decline while MCHP shows 4.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.75%
Operating income decline while MCHP shows 6.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.81%
Operating margin decline while MCHP shows 1.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
55.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x MCHP's 4.35%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-18.47%
Pre-tax income decline while MCHP shows 8.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.50%
Pre-tax margin decline while MCHP shows 3.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-43.53%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-14.51%
Net income decline while MCHP shows 24.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.06%
Net margin decline while MCHP shows 18.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.94%
EPS decline while MCHP shows 23.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.77%
Diluted EPS decline while MCHP shows 24.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.77%
Share count reduction while MCHP shows 0.13% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.76%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.