205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.55%
Positive growth while MCHP shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.72%
Cost growth less than half of MCHP's 17.07%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-0.04%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.30%
R&D growth above 1.5x MCHP's 0.58%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.55%
Operating expenses growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.37%
Total costs growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.54%
Interest expense reduction while MCHP shows 11.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.07%
D&A growth while MCHP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.95%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.85%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.31%
Operating margin decline while MCHP shows 0.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-166.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-6.11%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-37.01%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-2.16%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.27%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.54%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.22%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.33%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.