205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.30%
Revenue decline while MPWR shows 4.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.38%
Cost reduction while MPWR shows 5.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-4.22%
Gross profit decline while MPWR shows 3.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.09%
Margin expansion while MPWR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-17.26%
R&D reduction while MPWR shows 4.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.60%
Operating expenses reduction while MPWR shows 9.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.97%
Total costs reduction while MPWR shows 6.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.50%
D&A growth while MPWR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
1060.00%
EBITDA growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1103.17%
EBITDA margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.09%
Operating income growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.27%
Operating margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-53.10%
Other expenses reduction while MPWR shows 138.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.57%
Pre-tax income decline while MPWR shows 1.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.62%
Tax expense reduction while MPWR shows 7.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.77%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.58%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.56%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.63%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.73%
Share count reduction below 50% of MPWR's 0.04%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
17.08%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MPWR's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.