205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.74%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-10.06%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
0.15%
Positive growth while MPWR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.25%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x MPWR's 0.66%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.43%
R&D growth less than half of MPWR's 6.00%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.29%
Operating expenses reduction while MPWR shows 14.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.27%
Total costs reduction while MPWR shows 8.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.84%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-0.90%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.14%
EBITDA margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.69%
Operating income growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.94%
Operating margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-45.24%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.40%
Pre-tax income decline while MPWR shows 99.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.42%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MPWR's 99.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
69.23%
Tax expense growth while MPWR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-16.12%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.24%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.29%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.33%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.36%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.