205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.70%
Revenue decline while MPWR shows 12.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-6.77%
Cost reduction while MPWR shows 12.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-0.29%
Gross profit decline while MPWR shows 12.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.48%
Margin expansion while MPWR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.53%
R&D growth less than half of MPWR's 22.03%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.00%
Other expenses growth less than half of MPWR's 403.38%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
1.18%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MPWR's 24.84%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-3.55%
Total costs reduction while MPWR shows 17.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.67%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x MPWR's 0.59%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-0.40%
D&A reduction while MPWR shows 4.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
3.75%
EBITDA growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.64%
EBITDA margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.29%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.46%
Operating margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
355.00%
Similar other expenses growth to MPWR's 403.38%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
4.49%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MPWR's 13.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.40%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x MPWR's 0.84%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-302.00%
Tax expense reduction while MPWR shows 146.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
17.55%
Net income growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.81%
Net margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.84%
EPS growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.35%
Diluted EPS growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.61%
Share count reduction while MPWR shows 0.74% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.70%
Diluted share reduction while MPWR shows 0.34% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.