205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.79%
Positive growth while MPWR shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.84%
Cost increase while MPWR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
7.87%
Positive growth while MPWR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.01%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x MPWR's 0.29%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.52%
R&D growth less than half of MPWR's 12.02%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.84%
Other expenses reduction while MPWR shows 79.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-1.30%
Operating expenses reduction while MPWR shows 7.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.49%
Total costs growth while MPWR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.04%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.80%
D&A reduction while MPWR shows 8.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
17.60%
EBITDA growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.13%
EBITDA margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.68%
Operating income growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.52%
Operating margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
618.18%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x MPWR's 79.63%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
21.42%
Pre-tax income growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.71%
Pre-tax margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.14%
Tax expense growth while MPWR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
24.76%
Net income growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.83%
Net margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.49%
EPS growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.14%
Diluted EPS growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.22%
Share count reduction below 50% of MPWR's 0.40%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.32%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x MPWR's 1.37%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.