205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
20.82%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.29%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-19.07%
Cost reduction while MRVL shows 4.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
177.57%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.82%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
129.74%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
166.86%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.73%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.65%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
332.53%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.23%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
2457.63%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2051.37%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
251.26%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 15.99%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
190.73%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 5.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-385.50%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-65.91%
Pre-tax income decline while MRVL shows 8.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-71.78%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 3.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-164.75%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 9600.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-44.77%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-54.29%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
19.85%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.85%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 1.17%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.