205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.37%
Revenue decline while MRVL shows 4.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
49.29%
Cost growth above 1.5x MRVL's 4.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-66.16%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 3.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-63.85%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-63.74%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.50%
Total costs reduction while MRVL shows 2.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-114.29%
D&A reduction while MRVL shows 1.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-9.09%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 4.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
12.50%
Similar operating income growth to MRVL's 15.99%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
6.55%
Operating margin growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 5.31%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
64.29%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
25.93%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 8.06%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
20.89%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
600.00%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 9600.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
3.57%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.99%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.17%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.17%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.70%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-3.70%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 1.17% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.