205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.37%
Revenue growth 50-75% of MRVL's 4.29%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
4.49%
Similar cost growth to MRVL's 4.77%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
-7.67%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 3.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-9.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.77%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.84%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.65%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
500.00%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.23%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-197.22%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 4.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-190.35%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-217.14%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 15.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-209.81%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 5.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-160.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-210.00%
Pre-tax income decline while MRVL shows 8.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-202.83%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 3.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
135.71%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 9600.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-190.74%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-184.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-160.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-160.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.49%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.49%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 1.17% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.