205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
91.94%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.29%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
78.64%
Cost growth above 1.5x MRVL's 4.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
122.82%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.82%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
16.09%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
20.71%
R&D growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.74%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.93%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
52.37%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.65%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-433.33%
D&A reduction while MRVL shows 1.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
184.29%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
143.92%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
188.14%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 15.99%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
145.92%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 5.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
50.00%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
170.72%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 8.06%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
136.84%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
164.71%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 9600.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
560.71%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
340.03%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
589.13%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
589.13%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.32%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.74%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 1.17%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.