205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.31%
Revenue decline while MRVL shows 4.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.95%
Cost reduction while MRVL shows 4.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
2.08%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of MRVL's 3.82%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
4.49%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.79%
R&D reduction while MRVL shows 1.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.56%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-5.72%
Total costs reduction while MRVL shows 2.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.24%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.23%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
59.31%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
63.07%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.74%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 15.99%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
27.68%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 5.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-82.46%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
6.98%
Similar pre-tax income growth to MRVL's 8.06%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
9.50%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
7.50%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 9600.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
587.55%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
603.78%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
558.82%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
568.75%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.89%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.76%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 1.17%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.