205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-9.93%
Revenue decline while MRVL shows 4.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
2.50%
Cost growth 50-75% of MRVL's 4.77%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
-29.32%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 3.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-21.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-55.74%
R&D reduction while MRVL shows 1.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.72%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-15.94%
Total costs reduction while MRVL shows 2.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.31%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.23%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
70.19%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
66.90%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
89.00%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 15.99%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
87.79%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 5.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-11.36%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
110.90%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 8.06%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
112.10%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-94.39%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 9600.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
103.86%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
104.28%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
105.56%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
105.56%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.07%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.33%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 1.17%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.