205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.91%
Revenue decline while MRVL shows 4.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.02%
Cost reduction while MRVL shows 4.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
6.12%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.82%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
7.10%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-6.71%
R&D reduction while MRVL shows 1.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.26%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.18%
Total costs reduction while MRVL shows 2.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-136.84%
D&A reduction while MRVL shows 1.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-136.71%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 4.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-138.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-72.73%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 15.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-74.32%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 5.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
164.10%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
282.35%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 8.06%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
285.88%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
266.67%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 9600.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
372.73%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
377.09%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
200.00%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
200.00%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.25%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.48%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 1.17%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.