205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-9.23%
Revenue decline while MRVL shows 12.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-6.50%
Cost reduction while MRVL shows 12.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-17.32%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 12.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-8.91%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.11%
R&D reduction while MRVL shows 20.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.49%
Operating expenses reduction while MRVL shows 9.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.32%
Total costs reduction while MRVL shows 10.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.62%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
53.06%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 15.23%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
68.62%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 2.38%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
17.79%
Operating income growth below 50% of MRVL's 1442.11%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.43%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 1270.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-47.62%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 128.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
12.89%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MRVL's 188.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.03%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 155.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-79.66%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 187.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
40.61%
Net income growth below 50% of MRVL's 188.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
34.57%
Net margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 156.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
36.36%
EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 100.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
36.36%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 100.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.67%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 45.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-6.67%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 7.88% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.