205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.98%
Revenue decline while MRVL shows 12.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
3.29%
Cost growth less than half of MRVL's 15.35%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-10.41%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 10.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-7.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.04%
R&D growth less than half of MRVL's 8.26%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.16%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of MRVL's 3.74%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
2.93%
Total costs growth less than half of MRVL's 9.59%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.05%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-15.32%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 19.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.71%
EBITDA margin decline while MRVL shows 5.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.33%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 58.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.07%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 40.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
44.83%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-20.56%
Pre-tax income decline while MRVL shows 51.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.12%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 34.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.68%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 17.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12.97%
Net income decline while MRVL shows 65.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.29%
Net margin decline while MRVL shows 46.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.12%
EPS decline while MRVL shows 57.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.50%
Diluted EPS decline while MRVL shows 79.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.35%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.