205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.99%
Revenue decline while MRVL shows 2.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-6.94%
Cost reduction while MRVL shows 0.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-8.87%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 3.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.96%
Margin decline while MRVL shows 1.40% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.98%
R&D growth less than half of MRVL's 4.80%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.93%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.71%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.80%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.21%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-10.72%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 818.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.97%
EBITDA margin decline while MRVL shows 799.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.98%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 72.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.94%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 72.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.26%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-19.39%
Pre-tax income decline while MRVL shows 66.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.39%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 67.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.41%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 438.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12.32%
Net income decline while MRVL shows 62.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.71%
Net margin decline while MRVL shows 63.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.09%
EPS decline while MRVL shows 62.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.26%
Diluted EPS decline while MRVL shows 62.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.28%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 0.22% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-3.79%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 0.22% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.