205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.35%
Revenue growth below 50% of MRVL's 15.39%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
3.26%
Cost growth less than half of MRVL's 20.44%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
8.67%
Similar gross profit growth to MRVL's 10.75%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
2.18%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.87%
R&D reduction while MRVL shows 1.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.13%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 0.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-3.34%
Operating expenses reduction while MRVL shows 0.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.69%
Total costs growth less than half of MRVL's 10.72%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-4.17%
Interest expense reduction while MRVL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.33%
D&A growth 50-75% of MRVL's 0.61%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
15.02%
EBITDA growth below 50% of MRVL's 53.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.15%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 29.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
19.65%
Operating income growth below 50% of MRVL's 83.20%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.51%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 58.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.76%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.19%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MRVL's 60.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.01%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 39.23%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.35%
Tax expense growth while MRVL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.94%
Net income growth below 50% of MRVL's 66.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.72%
Net margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 44.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.22%
EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 61.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.58%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 75.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.03%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.10%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 0.11% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.