205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.60%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 0.39%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
1.27%
Cost increase while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
3.58%
Similar gross profit growth to MRVL's 4.27%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
0.95%
Margin expansion below 50% of MRVL's 3.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.33%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.52%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.37%
Total costs growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.09%
Interest expense growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.69%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
3.66%
EBITDA growth below 50% of MRVL's 18.35%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.03%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 17.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.43%
Operating income growth below 50% of MRVL's 29.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.75%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 29.04%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-16.67%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 276.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.21%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MRVL's 39.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.54%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 39.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.17%
Tax expense growth while MRVL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.10%
Net income growth below 50% of MRVL's 39.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.41%
Net margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 39.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.45%
EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 35.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.56%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 42.11%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.99%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 1.33% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.94%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.