205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.35%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-1.80%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
0.52%
Positive growth while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.87%
Margin expansion below 50% of MRVL's 2.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.58%
R&D growth above 1.5x MRVL's 0.65%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.00%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.58%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.63%
Total costs growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.26%
Interest expense reduction while MRVL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.32%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-13.77%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.08%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-98.31%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 581.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.17%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.87%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-42.67%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-4.78%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.81%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.90%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.20%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 0.48%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.10%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 0.04%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.