205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.70%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-6.77%
Cost reduction while MRVL shows 1.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-0.29%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.48%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.53%
R&D growth while MRVL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.00%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.18%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 0.92%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
-3.55%
Total costs reduction while MRVL shows 1.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.67%
Interest expense growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.40%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
3.75%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.64%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.29%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.46%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
355.00%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.49%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.40%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-302.00%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
17.55%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.81%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.84%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.35%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.61%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.70%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.