205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.23%
Revenue decline while MRVL shows 7.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.23%
Cost reduction while MRVL shows 6.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-7.26%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 9.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.09%
Margin decline while MRVL shows 1.53% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
4.84%
R&D growth less than half of MRVL's 11.23%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 136.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
1.98%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 4.51%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-1.96%
Total costs reduction while MRVL shows 5.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
13.33%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x MRVL's 3.82%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
6.84%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-7.83%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 3.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.71%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.12%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 101.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.22%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 86.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
233.33%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x MRVL's 6.07%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-10.20%
Pre-tax income decline while MRVL shows 1790.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.23%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 1654.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
16.10%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 5104.89%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-12.95%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.16%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.96%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.15%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.11%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.