PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.91%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-4.02%
Cost reduction while MU shows 1.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
6.12%
Positive growth while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
7.10%
Margin expansion while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-6.71%
R&D reduction while MU shows 9.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.26%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MU's 6.53%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-0.18%
Total costs reduction while MU shows 2.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-136.84%
D&A reduction while MU shows 8.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-136.71%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-138.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-72.73%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-74.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
164.10%
Other expenses growth less than half of MU's 10842.86%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
282.35%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
285.88%
Pre-tax margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
266.67%
Tax expense growth while MU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
372.73%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
377.09%
Net margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
200.00%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
200.00%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.25%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x MU's 30.51%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.48%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x MU's 30.51%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.