205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.49%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-10.16%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
13.22%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MU's 252.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
16.11%
Margin expansion below 50% of MU's 289.04%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.90%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.10%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-12.74%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.85%
D&A growth above 1.5x MU's 2.72%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
173.80%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 57.41%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
175.68%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 87.89%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
634.21%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 16.96%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
647.86%
Operating margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-55.34%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
283.08%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
292.87%
Pre-tax margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
286.36%
Tax expense growth while MU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
215.38%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
223.44%
Net margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
233.33%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
233.33%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.18%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.46%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.