205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.14%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.41%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
12.09%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MU's 82.17%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.74%
Margin expansion below 50% of MU's 80.53%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.97%
R&D reduction while MU shows 13.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.00%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MU's 0.35%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-1.92%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.00%
D&A reduction while MU shows 1.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
7.11%
EBITDA growth below 50% of MU's 101.92%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.87%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MU's 102.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
128.36%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 36.57%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
123.57%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 30.75%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
100.16%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
127.16%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 36.58%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
126.59%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 30.76%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
68.18%
Tax expense growth while MU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
119.86%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 46.14%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
119.45%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 41.19%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
119.44%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 46.39%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
119.44%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 46.39%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.54%
Share count reduction below 50% of MU's 0.22%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
2.54%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MU's 0.20%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.