PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.85%
Revenue decline while MU shows 11.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-9.39%
Cost reduction while MU shows 3.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-6.35%
Gross profit decline while MU shows 36.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.63%
Margin expansion below 50% of MU's 22.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.72%
R&D reduction while MU shows 12.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.55%
Operating expenses reduction while MU shows 22.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.90%
Total costs reduction while MU shows 7.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.39%
D&A growth less than half of MU's 10.21%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-7.79%
EBITDA decline while MU shows 23.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.07%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MU's 14.26%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-11.23%
Operating income decline while MU shows 107.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.66%
Operating margin decline while MU shows 86.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.29%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-14.00%
Pre-tax income decline while MU shows 66.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.66%
Pre-tax margin decline while MU shows 49.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
22.29%
Tax expense growth less than half of MU's 125.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-22.75%
Net income decline while MU shows 80.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.17%
Net margin decline while MU shows 62.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.74%
EPS decline while MU shows 69.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.91%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 69.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.77%
Share count reduction while MU shows 6.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.00%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 8.26% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.