205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.49%
Revenue decline while MU shows 42.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.86%
Cost reduction while MU shows 29.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.01%
Gross profit decline while MU shows 80.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.53%
Margin decline while MU shows 27.26% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.78%
R&D growth less than half of MU's 19.85%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.68%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-3.78%
Operating expenses reduction while MU shows 6.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.05%
Total costs reduction while MU shows 25.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.17%
Interest expense growth less than half of MU's 57.81%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-17.99%
D&A reduction while MU shows 48.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-7.20%
EBITDA decline while MU shows 214.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.80%
EBITDA margin decline while MU shows 235.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.44%
Operating income growth below 50% of MU's 166.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.95%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MU's 87.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-280.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1.61%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.60%
Tax expense growth less than half of MU's 1500.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-4.70%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.35%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.35%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.46%
Share count reduction while MU shows 1.24% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.54%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 5.90% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.