PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.70%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-6.77%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-0.29%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.48%
Margin expansion below 50% of MU's 6.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.53%
R&D growth less than half of MU's 6.41%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.00%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.18%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MU's 7.90%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-3.55%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
6.67%
Interest expense growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.40%
D&A reduction while MU shows 5.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
3.75%
EBITDA growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.64%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 3.52%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.29%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.46%
Operating margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
355.00%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.49%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.40%
Pre-tax margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-302.00%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
17.55%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.81%
Net margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.84%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.35%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.61%
Share count reduction while MU shows 0.36% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.70%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 0.35% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.