205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.85%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 13.36%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
17.89%
Cost growth above 1.5x MU's 6.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
17.82%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of MU's 30.11%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-0.02%
Margin decline while MU shows 14.77% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.85%
R&D growth while MU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.08%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 1100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-1.17%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
9.80%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MU's 4.43%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
2.08%
Interest expense growth less than half of MU's 10.87%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
0.40%
D&A growth less than half of MU's 4.18%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
19.67%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of MU's 27.48%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
1.55%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MU's 12.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
31.03%
Operating income growth below 50% of MU's 101.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.19%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MU's 78.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-143.14%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
24.08%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MU's 103.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.29%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MU's 79.73%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
331.68%
Tax expense growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 223.81%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize strategy.
-1.96%
Net income decline while MU shows 98.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.80%
Net margin decline while MU shows 74.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.65%
EPS decline while MU shows 94.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.03%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 97.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.11%
Share count change of 0.11% while MU is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.22%
Diluted share increase while MU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.